ANALYSIS OF JANUARY EFFECT ON BIG STOCK COMPANIES AND SMALL STOCK COMPANIES AT INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE

  • Nur Ariefin Addinpujoartanto Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta
Keywords: Market Anomaly, January Effect, Small Stock

Abstract

January Effect is one of market anomaly where the stock returns in January are higher than other months. Some of causes the January Effect are the actions of investor who carry out tax-loss selling and windows dressing. In addition, investors have different views to choose stocks, based on market capitalization dan risk. This study is purposed to find the January Effect in the Indonesia Stock Exchange and January Effect on small company stock is stronger than large company stock. The data is normally distributed using the One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The test using the OLS method with dummy variable at five percent significance level. By using a sample of 30 large company stocks and 30 small company stocks based on market capitalization during period 2013-2017, the result of this study found a January Effect in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. But the January Effect doesn’t occur on small company stock, except on large company stock during that periode.

Author Biography

Nur Ariefin Addinpujoartanto, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta

Management, Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta

References

[1] E. Fama, "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," The Journal of Finance, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 383-417, 1970.
[2] Undang-undang Pasar Modal no 8 Tahun 1995.
[3] E. Brigham and J. Houston, "Essentials of Financial Management Third Edition," Singapore, Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd, 2013, p. 2013.
[4] M. Asri, "Keuangan Keperilakuan," BPFE Yogyakarta, 2013.
[5] V. Ricciardi and H. Simon, "What is Behavioral Finance?," Business, Education and Technology Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-9, 2000.
[6] E. Bikas, D. Jurevičienė, P. Dubinskas and L. Novickytė, "Behavioural Finance: The Emergence and Development Trends," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 870-876, 2013.
[7] J. Ritter, "Behavioral Finance," Pacific Basin Finance Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 429-437, 2003.
[8] A. Berges, J. McConnell and G. Schlarbaum, "The Turn of the Year in Canada," The Journal of FInance, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 185-192, 1984.
[9] M. Rozeff and J. R. Kinney, "Capital market seasonality: The case of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 379-402, 1976.
[10] S. Kumar and R. Pathak, "Do the calendar anomalies still exist? Evidence from Indian currency market," Managerial Finance, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 136-150, 2016.
[11] I. Ullah and S. Ullah, "Market Efficiency Anomalies: A Study of January Effect In Karachi Stock Market," Journal of Managerial Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31-44, 2016.
[12] R. Haugen and P. Jorion, "The January Effect: Still There after All These Years," Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 27-31, 1996.
[13] M. Raj and D. Thruston, "January or April? Tests of the turn of the year effect in the New Zealand stock market," Applied Economics Letters, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 81-83, 1994.
[14] R. Pasaribu, "Stock Portfolio With Fama-French Model In Indonesian Stock Exchange," Journal of Accounting & Business, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2009.
[15] D. Franch and T. Trapani, "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Quaterly Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 3-12, 1994.
[16] G. Perez, "Do Small Indonesian Companies Have a Better Perfomance in the Stock Market than Larger Ones?," International Journal of Financial Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-6, 2017.
[17] J. Ritter, "The Buying and Selling Behavior of Individual Investors at the Turn of the Year," The Journal of Finance, vol. 43, p. 3, 1988.
[18] M. Reinganum and P. Gangopadhyay, "On Information Release and the January Effect: Accounting-Information Hypothesis," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 1, pp. 169-176, 1991.
[19] Y. Andrianto and A. Mirza, "A Testing of Efficient Markets Hypothesis in Indonesia Stock Market," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 219, pp. 99-103, 2016.
Published
2019-12-31